Border distinction here is very powerful. Photographers live in relatively closed communities, whic

British vanity fair hollywood photographer Simon Norfolk (Norfolk Simon, 1963) met Nida, where in mid-September in the thirty-fifth time was the Lithuanian photoartists union seminar. My task was to speak on the topic What happens Latvian contemporary photography while Norfolks Nida History Museum opened a small percentage of the project's vanity fair hollywood Burke + Norfolk: Photographs vanity fair hollywood from the war in Afghanistan (Burke + Norfolk: Photographs From The War in Afghanistan), the 19th century Irish photographer John Burke photos from Afghanistan are combined with Norfolk works. Last year the exhibition was seen in the Tate Modern art museum in London. Also Norfolks gave a lecture in which the telling of the history of Afghanistan, Berk and his own experience in this Central Asian country. It was certainly one of the most exciting lectures by photographer vanity fair hollywood had seen performed. With Nofolku meet the next morning for breakfast.
It seems I met Jonas (Jonas Staselis, Lithuania photoartists President of the Union - aut. Note.) vanity fair hollywood At the beginning of World Press Photo event. I gave a speech and I guess its because I landed here. All the winners had to speak. It was strange, because ... I have won the World Press Photo contest in the past and spoke as it was able to reach out to all photo editors and gallery owners, but now the approach has changed. Currently, all photographers are invited to the stage where they are whispers vanity fair hollywood to the microphone: "We made the film." Button is pressed, and the film began. All movies were terrible. And, in my opinion, vanity fair hollywood Jonah thought, "He looks like a man who knows how to speak. We should invite him. "
I was quite intrigued when I heard that there are two steps and that I have a choice vanity fair hollywood on which to go. One was photojournalists (Vilnius Photo Circle - aut. Note.) And other art photographers (seminar Nida - aut. Note.). I was willing to go to both. I exhibited their works to the Tate Modern art gallery in the museum, which is just as snobbish as gallery can all be in England. In addition, my works have won the World Press Photo competition - which in turn is an organization that draws attention to the hardcore, blood, guts and death. Interestingly, the same photos may seem attractive two different branches of photography - art photography and photojournalism. Perhaps vanity fair hollywood it means that the watershed that photojournalism art not disappear. When Jonah said that I have to choose which one to attend events, I chose both. Why not? Border rafting is interesting.
Border distinction here is very powerful. Photographers live in relatively closed communities, which rarely cooperate. Except for amateurs, young photographers do not want to be associated vanity fair hollywood with photoartists union. Nida Art is organized colonies residency program fifty Academy of Art, but they have not shown any interest in this seminar, although there are many interesting things to see. They simply believe vanity fair hollywood that it is not their world.
I am puzzled by the fact that they do not do their work portfolio. Yesterday spoke with two guys, and they said that they did not even have taken away with you. It seems pretty silly, given the opportunities that such events offer. But better not talk about it because I am not come here to hold forth on what went wrong in Lithuanian photography. I do not know anything about it.
There seems to be a measure of how technology and the Photo club, but I'm happy with the photo club I meet - I am happy to talk to any interested parties. Lots of college with a professional vanity fair hollywood orientation prepares professional artists. I was always vanity fair hollywood this idea seemed quite bizarre - that you can izskolot and you can become an artist. Something in all this is too sterile and dry. I do not know what art is, but I sure know that it does not become me, with the slogan: "Well, today we will make a great art, go!" It really does not happen. I did not become a photographer to become an artist. I became vanity fair hollywood a photographer to talk about things that interest me. If this leads to art, well, that's fine, but for me it is not a decisive factor. I became a photographer, to tell stories, to noise emissions around the policy, and I will go anywhere to find the audience. I would love to speak with football's club members or people in the store. I also welcome the opportunity to exhibit their work at the gallery. The reason why I chose the Tate Modern art museum is more anger because - why my works could be exhibited here? Since who, the hell, the place is meant ?! Only stupid sculptures and portraits ?! In fact, that's what they call the great art was created with a much larger political context. Just one hundred years after the creation of this work a large part of the policy is faded. Even artists such as Goya. He was a fighter and propagandist, but now his works are exhibited in art galleries and they say nothing. You just look at them and think how wonderful light displays. As for me, I will go anywhere,