First I want to make clear that this text is not meant to condemn, feminism or queer theory, but to the language and accessibility of a large part of the contemporary theoretical queer feminist publications in question and criticize. I am a feminist and I've learned a lot from both the theory and practice of feminism. The awesome analyzes in feminist and queer texts and ways of working glamour shopping card together and take action to give me strength and inspiration. But the more I am disappointed by the elitism of much of the current theoretical publications.
Dealing with problems of exclusion, elitist behavior and power structures has always been an important issue in the feminist movement. Formal leader glamour shopping card shelf positions were not done in collectives in the second wave feminists because did not want to take over the hierarchies and inequalities of the male dominated society but arose informal elites and covered by the media spokeswomen [1]. Both informal and formally structured organizations had certain (groups of) women more power and they have that power used - consciously or not, deliberately or not - to exclude others, alienate or dominate. glamour shopping card Who speaks, who publishes, and who was she? Represent Who is brought to silence those who are marginalized, who has nothing to say? (See also: blog text about power techniques) we can Throughout feminist history see certain groups of women, such as lesbians glamour shopping card ("the lavender menace"), black women, poor women or women of lower classes who fought for inclusion and trans women. Able development - oppression based on disability glamour shopping card - and ageisme - oppression based on age - have led to exclusion and unequal power relations in the feminist movement, even though feminists were theoretically against and they wanted every woman welcome and embrace. (See also: blog text about self-criticism and privileges)
These problems are still more or less present in feminist groups today, glamour shopping card but feminists try to at least work on, they discuss it and find solutions. Books, articles, blog entries, and zines are written about the experiences of exclusion, informal hierarchical structures in groups and ableistische white middle class dominance. This is one of the things that attract me to feminism: we the personal and the political together and that our own democratic and egalitarian feminist groups so we may try to organize while at the same time striving for structural changes on a larger scale. The problems of elitism and unequal distribution of power / influence exist in other (action) groups, only they themselves let alone that they have to try to change something. Rarely aware of it,
While there comes a lot of great work to improve feminist organizational structures but we are still busy discussing and fighting exclusion of certain groups and marginalization of women - it is far from "off" - is another example of elitist practice the feminist movement crept. This problem is related to and influenced by postmodernism and the introduction of gender studies at the universities. Although glamour shopping card I welcome the acceptance of gender studies as a "real social science" and its presence and influence in universities and academic journals, but I also notice some disadvantages. The language used in academic publications is excessively difficult, the publications themselves are inaccessible (hard to get) and the development of feminist glamour shopping card theory and writing - feminist theory production - seems reserved glamour shopping card for a professional academic elite that is rarely connected or are participating to feminist activism, fight and practice. Unfortunately, these problems are rarely addressed in contemporary feminist glamour shopping card movement, even though they have major consequences, and therefore I feel compelled to discuss it in this text.
Western feminism has changed since the second wave, not only by internal positive developments (eg attention to intersection thinking, questioning glamour shopping card of universalism and criticized the privileges of certain groups of women), but also by the backlash from the 80s. With the disappearance of the feminist mass movement - similar to the disintegration of other social mass movements - feminists glamour shopping card began to focus on (or pull in back) subsidized institutes, individual cultural projects and academic research. Postmodern ideas started to influence feminist theory. I accept some aspects of postmodernism well as the questioning of dogma (also
No comments:
Post a Comment